Ashwin Criticizes Punjab Kings’ Two-Venue Strategy Amid IPL Slump
Ravichandran Ashwin has taken to his YouTube channel to question Punjab Kings’ decision to split home games between Mohali and Dharamsala in IPL 2026. The critique arrives as PBKS slide into a five‑match losing streak, turning a promising playoff bid into a desperate scramble.
The two‑venue plan was pitched as a way to grow the fan base in the Himalayas, yet the abrupt switch may have cost the side precious rhythm at a stage when consistency matters most. Below we unpack the tactical fallout, the players caught in the crossfire and what the next fixtures could mean for the tournament.
The Stats Behind the Strategy
| Venue | Matches Played | Avg. First‑Innings Score | Win % |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mohali (IS Bindra) | 5 | 175 | 60% |
| Dharamsala (HPCA) | 5 | 153 | 20% |
The numbers tell a simple story: Punjab’s batting output dropped by roughly 22 runs when the venue changed, and their win percentage fell by two‑thirds. The low‑bounce, green‑top at Dharamsala also saw a higher proportion of wickets falling in the first 15 overs, a stark contrast to the seamer‑friendly pitch in Mohali where top order partnerships flourished.
Beyond raw figures, the shift forced a reshuffle of the batting order. Shreyas Iyer, who thrived on the extra bounce at Mohali, was pushed down to accommodate a more aggressive opener combo built for the slower surface. The move backfired, as Iyer’s strike rate slipped from 138 in Mohali to 112 in Dharamsala, reflecting his discomfort with the low‑skidding ball.
Why the Venue Switch Stung
Punjab entered the mid‑season with a four‑match unbeaten run, anchored by a balanced seam attack and a spin trio that exploited the lateral swing at the Punjab Cricket Association Stadium. The coaching staff, confident in their depth, elected to host the next three home games in Dharamsala to tap into the growing cricket audience in Himachal Pradesh.
From a strategic angle, the decision ignored two critical variables. First, the home‑ground advantage in IPL is rarely just about crowd size; it is about familiarity with the pitch’s rhythm. Second, the team’s composition was built around bowlers like Arshdeep and Rahul Chahar, whose variations work best on a surface that offers a little bounce and turn – traits more pronounced in Mohali.
The sudden need to adapt forced Punjab to alter their powerplay tactics. In Mohali, they often used a hard‑hitting opener to take advantage of the shorter boundaries. In Dharamsala, the tighter fence and slower outfield meant a more measured approach was required, a nuance the side failed to internalise quickly enough.
Player Mindset and Roles
Shreyas Iyer, the captain, found himself juggling leadership duties with personal form. The shift to a deeper batting spot meant he was often exposed to the new ball under different conditions, a scenario that has historically yielded modest returns for him.
All-rounder Mohammad Shami, usually a strike bowler on the new ball, had to adjust his lengths to the low‑bouncing pitch. His economy rose from 7.2 in Mohali to 8.4 in Dharamsala, indicating a struggle to extract movement.
On the spin front, emerging leg‑spinner Yash Dhull relished the extra turn, finishing with a tidy four‑wicket haul in Dharamsala. Yet the overall spin impact was muted because the team couldn’t build partnerships that allowed him to settle into longer spells.
Tournament Implications
If PBKS win both remaining games – one at Mohali, one back at Dharamsala – they could finish with 16 points, nudging into the fourth slot on net run rate. A loss in either match likely seals a fifth‑place finish, ending their playoff dream.
The scenario also puts pressure on other contenders. Delhi Capitals, currently perched on eight points, will watch Punjab’s fate closely; a Punjab win could push DC into a must‑win situation against Kolkata Knight Riders.
Beyond the immediate stakes, the debate sparked by Ashwin may prompt the IPL governing body to reconsider the two‑home‑venue model. While expanding the fan footprint is a noble goal, the league might need to enforce a minimum number of games at a primary venue to preserve competitive balance.
Fan Perspective
Punjab supporters have taken to social media, split between those who appreciate the outreach to Himachal fans and those who blame the move for the team’s collapse. A recurring sentiment is the feeling of “lost identity” – a team that once played with an unmistakable Mohali swagger now appears to be searching for its rhythm.
Ground‑level observations note that the crowd in Dharamsala, though passionate, is smaller, affecting the energy levels that players often feed off. The lack of a roaring home crowd may have amplified the psychological toll of the losing streak.
the two‑venue experiment has given Punjab Kings both a marketing win and a cricketing headache. The remaining fixtures will reveal whether the franchise can recalibrate on the field or if the strategic gamble will be remembered as a cautionary tale.




